Women's liberation movement is taken here to be equal to the feminist movement, which can be considered as a social mobility attempt that necessarily involves politics. The movement contains in itself different approaches as regards government functions and the definition of politics. The liberal feminist approach, within a reformist strategy, adopts a balanced view of politics in relation to bargaining with the government. In contrast, the radical feminist approach, adopting an essentialist strategy, and almost a revolutionary one, has a different definition of politics, and hence their stance versus government without any compromise. This paper aims to compare these two approaches.
PakNia, M. (2004). A Comparison of the Liberal and Radical Feminist Approaches. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 2(4), 41-64. doi: 10.22051/jwsps.2004.1242
MLA
Mahboobe PakNia. "A Comparison of the Liberal and Radical Feminist Approaches". Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 2, 4, 2004, 41-64. doi: 10.22051/jwsps.2004.1242
HARVARD
PakNia, M. (2004). 'A Comparison of the Liberal and Radical Feminist Approaches', Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 2(4), pp. 41-64. doi: 10.22051/jwsps.2004.1242
VANCOUVER
PakNia, M. A Comparison of the Liberal and Radical Feminist Approaches. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 2004; 2(4): 41-64. doi: 10.22051/jwsps.2004.1242
)